Hawk:
I find you are "neatly" packaging and categorizing individual opinions about BUSH and his speech to fit your political paradigm.
You seem to have departed from disagreeing with the popular impression that BUSH delivered a much better performance than usual, and when challenged by an individual's tenacity for that inference, you segway into an analysis of the content; i.e. "what is America getting into" and "will we go nuclear".
Those are valid questions and deserve consideration, but the original subject centered around the public performance of the president, specifically his ability to deliver an oral message.
His performance was in fact better than usual, with only one instance of losing his place or fumbling near the end. The sentences were obviously brief, but the words were bold, and it contained enough cliches to satisfy current emotions.
If you want to examine and scrutinize the content, please begin.